šŸŽ¬ Red Rooms – A Slow, Stylized Descent into Digital Obsession

We watched it. We napped. We have notes.

šŸ“¹ The Premise
Red Rooms (originally filmed in French and set in Montreal) follows a high-IQ fashion model who becomes disturbingly obsessed with a serial murder trial. She’s not on the jury, she’s not press—she’s just there. Attending every day. Giving nothing away. Slowly unraveling.

As she spirals deeper into obsession, she starts gambling online, exploring the dark web, and chasing the elusive third ā€œmurder videoā€ rumored to exist from a series of killings connected to the trial. If that sounds like a tense psychological thriller, hold that thought.


Listen to the review on Apple Podcasts


šŸŽ„ The Format
This is a sleek, sterile, slow-burn art house film that plays more like a drama than horror. Every shot is deliberate. Every walk down a hallway is uncut. Every smoothie blend, every AI interaction, every poker hand—played in full.

The pacing is patient. The acting is minimal. The story? Well, we’re still trying to piece it together.


āœ… What Makes It Work
The lead actress (Kelly-Depeault) delivers a quietly commanding performance. Most of the film is her—alone, watching, decoding, reacting. It’s expression-heavy, dialogue-light, and the camera is right there the whole time. Her portrayal of obsessive focus is believable and tightly controlled.

We also appreciated the French-language delivery, a strong sense of atmosphere, and some clever integrations of modern tech (like AI assistants, DuckDuckGo, and crypto bidding). The vibe? Mute cool. Moody. Intentionally uncomfortable.


āš ļø What Doesn’t Land
Let’s start with the runtime. At just under two hours, it feels like four. Nothing is rushed. Not a single thing. We watch her make a smoothie in real time. We watch her sit in alleys. We stare at her playing racquetball alone.

But it’s the unanswered whys that drag the film down:
– Why is she obsessed with the trial?
– Why sleep in an alley when you live in a luxury high-rise?
– Why destroy your AI assistant?
– Why impersonate a dead girl in front of her grieving mother?

The film dabbles in vigilante justice, trauma fixation, and dark web voyeurism—but without offering enough clarity to feel anchored. It gestures toward ideas, but never explores them. The mystery isn’t compelling, just… incomplete.


šŸ’ø Should It Have a Bigger Budget?
No. The budget was more than enough to do what this film was trying to do: minimalist psychological mood piece. It’s not lacking funds—it’s lacking narrative connection. There’s no clear character arc, no satisfying payoff, and the tone never shifts. Just more slow stares and unanswered tension.


šŸŽÆ The Verdict
We’re divided. Cade gave it a 5 (with bonus points for the nap). Kit gave it a 1 (for the lead actress alone). It’s well shot and confidently directed, but emotionally hollow. If you’re deep into artsy cinema, especially the kind where obsession is framed as aesthetic, you might find something here. But if you want character logic, emotional payoff, or actual horror? You’ll be waiting.



šŸ“ŗ Where to Watch
Streaming on Prime for $7 rental. If you enjoy movies where not much happens, but it happens in gorgeous lighting, this might be your moment.


šŸæ Pair This Movie With...

  • Snack: Unsalted almonds you forgot you were eating

  • Drink: Room-temperature mineral water

  • Activity: Light Googling about the dark web (but just for research)


We’re Kit. And we’re Cade. We’re Real People. Doing Real Reviews. And we still have questions. Not philosophical ones—just basic plot ones.

šŸŽ§ Spotify | šŸ Apple PodcastsĀ | šŸ“ø InstagramĀ | info@CadeandKit.com



šŸŽ¬ Late Night with the Devil – A Talk Show, a Demon, and a Whole Lot of Huh?

We sat through it so you don’t have to.

šŸ“¹ The Premise
In Late Night with the Devil, we follow a 1970s late-night TV host making one last desperate attempt to save his ratings during Halloween sweeps. The plan? Go full spooky: invite a psychic, a debunker, a traumatized child host to a demon, and the psychologist who wrote Talking with the Devil. What could go wrong on live TV?

As the episode unfolds, so does the chaos. Paranormal activity, hypnotism, audience walkouts, and a demonic possession escalate the drama in real time. The problem? Somewhere between the practical effects and the promising concept, the movie loses its voice.


Listen to the review on Apple Podcasts


šŸŽ„ The Format
It’s a stylized blend of ā€œfound footage,ā€ studio broadcast tape, and behind-the-scenes cuts (shown in black and white) that aims to replicate the look and feel of a real vintage TV production. The set is period-perfect, the VHS flicker filters are on point, and the commercial breaks have that classic ā€œPlease Stand Byā€ energy.

But the emotional throughline? Wobbly. We left more confused than creeped out — and not in the ā€œelevated horrorā€ kind of way.


āœ… What Makes It Work
We’ll give credit where it’s due: the set design is fantastic. It convincingly sells the 1970s talk show vibe. The visual blend of on-air and backstage moments helps separate real-time action from narrative reveals. One standout performance came from the young girl playing the demon vessel — her unsettling delivery was campy in a way that sort of worked.

The film also touches on some interesting themes — the power of suggestion, media manipulation, and grief as a gateway to vulnerability. There’s an attempt to comment on how far we’ll go to hold attention, especially on TV. But…


āš ļø What Doesn’t Land
...the story doesn’t really land anywhere. We spent most of the film unsure whether we were watching satire, psychological horror, or campy theater. The script tiptoes around deeper ideas — grief, cult influence, morality in media — but never commits. Is he haunted by demons or haunted by ratings?

The acting felt flat. Deadpan delivery where intensity was needed. Hollow moments where emotional stakes should have kicked in. And while the hypnosis subplot briefly flirts with interesting ideas about mass suggestion and gullibility, it gets dropped in favor of vague ghost logic and worm hallucinations. (Yeah. Worms.)


šŸ’ø Should It Have a Bigger Budget?Ā 
Nope. The problem isn’t the budget — it’s the cohesion. They had the right resources and some talented people. But the vision lacked clarity, and the execution wandered.


šŸŽÆ The Verdict
This movie had so much potential. The concept is solid. The era is rich. The genre lane is wide open. But for us, it felt like it kept setting up pins that never got knocked down. It hints at cult conspiracy, emotional breakdowns, demonic possession — but never lets any of it hit full force.

We both gave it a 3 out of 10. For the set, the effort, and the premise, not the payoff. If you’re deeply into art house horror or stylized ā€˜70s aesthetics, it might land. But for us? It missed.


šŸ“ŗ Where to Watch
Currently streaming on AMC and Shudder. Watch it if you're curious — or if you need something mildly spooky to fall asleep to.


šŸæ Pair This Movie With...

  • Snack: Leftover Halloween candy no one really wanted

  • Drink: Flat soda with a questionable aftertaste

  • Activity: Rewatching a better possession film to cleanse your palate



We’re Kit. And we’re Cade. We’re Real People. Doing Real Reviews. And next time, we’ll double-check Rotten Tomatoes before we hit ā€œplay.ā€

šŸŽ§Ā S⁠⁠potify⁠⁠ 
šŸ ⁠⁠Apple Podcasts ⁠⁠ 
šŸ“øĀ ā ā Instagram⁠⁠⁠ 
info@CadeandKit.comĀ 

šŸŽ¬ Final Destination: Bloodlines – The Franchise Returns with Fatal Flair

We survived it… barely. And we kind of loved it.


šŸ“¹ The Premise
It’s been over a decade since the last Final Destination film, but Death hasn’t been resting. In Bloodlines, the sixth installment in the cult horror series, we’re pulled back into the franchise’s signature loop of near-death, premonitions, and Rube Goldberg-style fatalities — only this time, the curse is hereditary.

Opening in the 1950s with a dreamlike tower collapse that was narrowly avoided, Bloodlines sets up a generational haunting. The woman who saved hundreds now lives off the grid, having tracked decades of obituary ā€œpatternsā€ and death's revenge. Her granddaughter is the new anchor, triggering a fresh cycle of suspense, suspicion, and creative carnage. It’s part family drama, part legacy horror, and pure Final Destination energy.


Listen to the Podcast on Apple Podcasts


šŸŽ„ The Franchise Formula Returns
We caught this one at Cineplex VIP in Calgary, Alberta (shout out to their amazing team), and brought a few people along who, like us, grew up scarred by logging trucks and exploding plane engines. Let’s be real: everyone remembers that scene from Final Destination 2. So when the marketing team leaned into that nostalgia — sending out branded logging trucks with ā€œComing Soonā€ plastered on the sides — we knew they understood the assignment.

The movie itself? It delivers. If you’ve never seen a Final Destination film, Bloodlines still works as a standalone. If you have seen them, you’ll catch the callbacks — but they’re handled with just enough subtlety to feel earned, not recycled.


āœ… What Makes It Work
The setup is tight. The idea of inherited trauma mixed with inherited ā€œsurvivor’s guiltā€ gives this entry a deeper emotional hook. The acting is solid, the pacing moves, and the deaths… well, they’re why we came.

This series thrives on tension and payoff. You start seeing signs — a flickering light, a misaligned screw, a dropped item — and the dread builds. And when the final snap happens? It’s always a little worse than you imagined. That’s the fun. This installment nails that balance, giving us suspense sequences that feel earned without overplaying the gore for shock’s sake.


āš ļø What Doesn’t Land
It’s not breaking genre. You’re not here for a reinvention. And while it does hint at potential spinoffs or sequels, the connective tissue to the larger mythology sometimes gets a little murky. A few plot beats are rushed (the grandmother's timeline book could’ve been a whole movie on its own), and the algorithm-of-death logic is starting to stretch.


šŸ’ø Should It Have a Bigger Budget?
Honestly? No. Part of what makes Final Destination work is its B-movie energy with A-tier execution. Give us strong direction, decent effects, and actors who sell the terror — we don’t need Marvel money. Bloodlines looks great, feels lean, and makes smart use of practical setups.


šŸŽÆ The Verdict
Final Destination: Bloodlines is exactly what it needs to be — a tight, effective horror entry that pays homage to the series while giving newcomers an accessible ride. The kill scenes are fresh, the suspense holds up, and the generational theme gives it just enough weight.

For us, it was a 7.5 out of 10. Not because it blew the genre open, but because it respected what made this franchise fun: the inevitability of death, and the weird, winding road it takes to get there.


šŸ“ŗ Where to Watch
Now in theaters. And yes, it’s worth seeing on the big screen with other people yelling, gasping, and squirming beside you.


šŸæ Pair This Movie With...

  • Snack: Popcorn with ghost pepper dust (because you deserve to suffer a little)

  • Drink: Cherry slushie (red, obviously)

  • Activity: Sitting very far away from anything that could fall, snap, swing, or explode



We’re Real People. Doing Real Reviews. And we’re not driving behind logging trucks for a long time.

šŸŽ§Ā S⁠⁠potify⁠⁠ 
šŸ ⁠⁠Apple Podcasts ⁠⁠ 
šŸ“øĀ ā ā Instagram⁠⁠⁠ 
info@CadeandKit.comĀ 

šŸ§Ÿā€ā™€ļø Love Will Tear Us Apart — A Blood-Soaked Short with a Lot of Heart

An interview feature from CUFF 2025 with Cade & Kit

šŸ“¹ The Premise
We caught Love Will Tear Us Apart at the Calgary Underground Film Festival and were immediately drawn in—not just by the blood and goo (though there’s plenty), but by the emotional pulse beneath the body horror. This short film from a trio of emerging creators—director Elijah Ziegler, lead actor Carter Dodd, and co-star Skyler Grey—is the kind of genre surprise CUFF is famous for. So of course, we had to talk to them.


Listen on Apple Podcasts


šŸŽ„ The Team Behind the Gore
Elijah, Carter, and Skyler met during film school, though their paths didn’t fully cross until this project. Elijah wrote Love Will Tear Us Apart as a kind of emotional antidote to a more cynical earlier film (The Lamb), inspired by his real-life relationship and produced with his partner Carmen, who wore every hat from editor to production designer.

Skyler joined the team after spotting the logo on the script and feeling an instant pull. Carter, already close with Elijah from their first film, signed on again—cementing a creative crew that quickly turned into a real film family.


āœ… What Makes It Work
This is a blood-slicked short about romantic decay—giddy, gooey, and somehow still tender. The team pulled off incredible prosthetic work on a small budget, with Skyler fully immersed (and often partially blind) under prosthetics. Elijah credits the cast and Carmen’s everything-everywhere-at-once producing for pulling the vision together. And Carter? He wins the blooper reel with a fake tooth gag that wouldn’t stay in place—pure indie chaos.


āš ļø What Doesn’t Land
Very little, honestly. This is a tight, high-impact short that knows what it is. If anything, we’re just greedy—we want more. Elijah even jokes that the film didn’t tear them apart, despite the title. In fact, it stitched them closer.


šŸ’ø Should It Have a Bigger Budget?
Give these three a feature. Full stop. Their synergy, commitment to practical effects, and balance of dark comedy with real heart deserve a larger canvas (and more fake teeth that stick).


šŸŽÆ The Verdict
Love Will Tear Us Apart isn’t just a catchy title—it’s a playful inversion of romantic horror, packed with visual texture, genre savvy, and genuine affection behind the camera. At CUFF, it stood out not just for its splatter, but for the love baked into its DNA.


šŸ“ŗ Where to Watch
Festival circuit for now. But keep your eyes peeled—this team isn’t done.



šŸŽ§Ā Spotify⁠⁠⁠

šŸĀ Apple Podcasts ⁠

šŸ“øĀ Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠

info@CadeandKit.com


šŸŽ¬ Interview: Jakob Skrzypa on Vampire Zombies from Space and Building a Cult Classic From Scratch

Hi, we’re Cade & Kit.
Usually we’re here to review. But today we’re here to celebrate.

At CUFF 2025, we sat down with Jakob — writer, producer, and co-architect of Vampire Zombies from Space, one of our favorite discoveries of the festival. A satirical, wildly committed 1950s B-movie parody, the film blends camp, horror, and deeply intentional comedy in ways that had us laughing and admiring the technical craft.

This is a conversation about making the stupid smart, the sincere ridiculous, and why comedy is harder than people think.


🧠 ā€œAn Earnest Approach to Idiocyā€

Right out of the gate, Jakob said it best:

ā€œIt’s a dumb title. And it’s a dumb movie. But we wanted to make the dumbest movie as seriously and as well as we could.ā€

Vampire Zombies from Space is black-and-white, full of miniatures, fake rubber bats, retro costumes, and practical effects that walk the perfect line between clever and chaotic. The film feels like it was made by people who grew up watching Ed Wood and Mel Brooks, but also know their way around a story structure.

Jakob and his writing partner Alex went through 24 drafts of the script, which shows. Every character has a purpose. Every gag has pacing. Every absurd moment is grounded in sincerity.


šŸŽ­ The Key to Great Comedy? Don’t Wink.

One of the highlights of our conversation was Jakob’s take on comedic tone:

ā€œTo these characters, it’s not a joke. Even if what’s happening is funny, they’re taking it seriously.ā€

That’s why the film lands. Whether it’s a man fist-fighting a pair of severed legs or a patriot encouraging everyone to kill themselves to avoid zombification, the humor works because the characters mean it. There’s no wink to the camera. No ā€œget it?ā€ pause.

Even the most absurd bits—like a greaser grieving a lost threesome—are delivered with full emotional commitment.


🦵 Favorite Scenes (and Severed Limbs)

We asked Jakob to share his favorite moments during production, and he gave us two:

  1. A rambling military general who describes everything in the most unnecessarily complicated terms.

  2. A fully choreographed fight scene between a man and a pair of severed legs, made possible through some beautifully executed VFX.

We were particularly obsessed with that second one. Kit—who’s notoriously hard to impress with visual effects—called it ā€œgenuinely hilarious and technically impressive,ā€ especially because it committed to the bit longer than it should have. And that’s where the laugh lived.


šŸŽ­ Casting: B-listers, cult icons, and local mayors

Originally scheduled to shoot in 2020 (oops), the team had considered a few recognizable union actors. But when the pandemic forced delays, they pivoted—focusing instead on cult figures and local gems.

  • They cast Judith O’Dea from Night of the Living Dead

  • Pulled in characters from the Tim & Eric universe

  • Included non-actors, like the actual mayor of Jakob’s hometown, for that slightly-off delivery that only non-actors can pull off

The result is a perfectly unpolished ensemble that balances real performances with just enough wooden weirdness to echo the film’s 1950s inspiration.


šŸ§›ā€ā™‚ļø The Ending That Almost Was

One of our favorite dark comedy beats involves a character making a speech to rally the town—only to suggest they all kill themselves before the zombies can get to them. He follows through with a hatchet. The others… do not.

Turns out that was almost the film’s original ending: a mass suicide that left the vampires standing there confused.

ā€œWe were going for a Holy Grail-style disappointment. But in the end, we figured we owed people a real third act after 90 minutes of chaos.ā€

Fair.


šŸ‘» The Horror Film That Shaped Him

When asked about his favorite horror movie, Jakob gave the answer and the origin story: The Exorcist, rented on VHS at a garage sale when he was eight years old. A raised Catholic, Jakob was so scared he asked his church if demons were real.

They said yes.

ā€œIt scared the hell out of me. And it stuck.ā€

And that’s how horror loyalty is born.


šŸŽ¬ What’s Next?

Jakob teased a new project currently in development: a satirical slasher film called Canada Day, which carries the same tone and ambition as Vampire Zombies, but with an entirely new visual style and subgenre target.

We’ll be watching.

And we’ll be sitting in the back row grinning.


šŸŽ¤ We’re Cade & Kit. Real People. Real Reviews.
But sometimes we interview filmmakers who made us laugh out loud in public.

Thank you, Jakob. And long live the greaser, the rubber bats, and the mayor.


Links for crew

⁠The Film⁠ | Directed by Mike Stasko,| Writer, Producer: Editor Jakob Skrzypa | Writer, Producer: Alexander Forman | DOP⁠


Cast

⁠Andrew Bee⁠ | Oliver Georgiou⁠ | Jessica Antovski⁠ |Rashaun Baldeo⁠ | Craig Gloster⁠ | Robert Kemeny⁠ | David Liebe Hart⁠ | Lloyd Kaufman ⁠


Our Links

šŸŽ§ S⁠⁠potifyā ā Ā šŸ ⁠⁠Apple Podcasts ⁠⁠ šŸ“ø ⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠⁠ info@CadeandKit.com

šŸŽ¬ Portal to Hell: Gorgeous Lights, Gory Portals, and a Mid-Movie Nap

When the laundromat opens a gate to the underworld, and you still somehow doze off.

Some movies try to hide their weirdness.Ā Portal to Hell proudly tapes it to the front window of a laundromat and dares you to ask about it.

We went in expecting mid-tier camp, neon lighting, and some literal hellfire. We got... well, all of that. But also: a surprisingly slow midsection, a demon with a deal to make, and one of us fighting the urge to take a nap between blood sacrifices.



šŸ“¹ The Premise: Three Souls for the Spin Cycle

Set entirely in a laundromat, Portal to Hell begins with a man just trying to do his laundry. Until, of course, a demonic entity crawls out of one of the machines and offers him a deal: deliver three souls, and the portal will close.

Spoiler: he says no.
Until he doesn’t.

Add in a crush on the laundromat clerk, a suspiciously well-dressed demon, and some moral compromise, and you've got the recipe for a light satanic negotiation drama… with Tide Pods.


šŸŽ„ The Format: Horror-Comedy in Neon Drag

This film looks fantastic.

The production design is soaked in red, blue, and yellow neon — giving it a late-night music video energy that’s completely at odds with how slow the second act moves.

The first ten minutes? Hooked.
The last ten? Solid.
The middle? Might’ve needed a coffee.

It's hard to tell if the movie wants to go full camp or keep things grounded. It flirts with both, which means the tone starts strong but gets muddy. Still, visually? Gorgeous. Easily one of the best-looking films we saw at CUFF.


āœ… What Makes It Work

• The concept is clever. Laundry as a gateway to hell? Why not.
• The first act is fun. Snappy dialogue, absurd setup, great world-building.
• It looks amazing. Seriously — the lighting alone deserves a separate credit.


āš ļø What Doesn’t Land

• The middle sags. The pacing just evaporates in the second act.
• It needed to pick a lane. Camp or serious? It tries to straddle both and stumbles.
• Almost lost Cade to napland. That’s never a good sign.


šŸ’ø Should It Have a Bigger Budget?

Not really. It actually looks way more expensive than it probably was. A bigger budget might've overcomplicated the charm. What it really needed was a tighter edit and a better comedic rhythm to carry the energy all the way through.


šŸŽÆ The Verdict

Portal to Hell is the kind of film you want to love. The premise is fun, the setting is unique, and the production is polished. But it never quite decides what it wants to be. It needed to either lean harder into the comedy or crank up the horror.

Still, it earns points for being different — and we’ll never look at laundromats the same way again.

Cade: 5/10 — ā€œGood concept. Good look. Lost me a little in the middle.ā€
Kit: 4.5/10 — ā€œStarted strong, ended okay, sagged in the middle. Like a demon in slouchy jeans.ā€


šŸ“ŗ Where to Watch

Festival screenings or indie horror channels — this one feels built for late-night cult followings. Keep an eye out if you like your horror washed in neon and folded with moral ambiguity.


šŸæ Pair This Movie With...

• Snack: Microwave popcorn with too much butter
• Drink: Vending machine soda with mysterious fizz

• Activity: Laundry. (But maybe don’t reach into the dryer too deep.)


šŸŽ§Ā Spotify⁠⁠⁠

šŸĀ Apple Podcasts ⁠

šŸ“øĀ Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠

info@cadeandkit.com

šŸŽ¬ Sugar Rot: The Sweetest Movie to Ever Make Us Deeply Uncomfortable

Bring candy. And maybe a therapist.

Some films you watch with friends.
Others… you absolutely should not.

We didn’t know what we were walking into with Sugar Rot. The poster looked playful. The premise sounded weird-but-fun. So we invited a whole group to come with us.

That was a mistake.

By the end of this surreal, pastel-drenched horror spiral, we were avoiding eye contact with half the audience, Googling whether trauma can be transmitted via soft-serve, and whispering ā€œdid we just see that?ā€ far more often than we should’ve.



šŸ“¹ The Premise: Ice Cream, Objectification, and Slow Internal Decay

Sugar Rot centers on a young woman working at an ice cream shop. At first, it’s unclear whether the shop is also a strip club — and that confusion kind of sets the tone. She’s surrounded by pressure: a friend constantly undergoing plastic surgery to impress a boyfriend, men who treat her like an object, and a world that seems to expect sweetness from her no matter what.

So she gives them what they want. And it rots her from the inside out.

Literally.

We’re talking cotton candy coming out of body parts, frosting-covered gore, and an emotional collapse that looks like a candy ad gone rancid.


šŸŽ„ The Format: Art House Meets Gorecore

This is a film that says no thank you to genre rules.

It’s one part erotic nightmare, one part feminist performance piece, and one part body-horror dessert table. The visuals are aggressively saccharine — pastels, candy, bright lighting — which makes the subject matter hit even harder. Everything looks fun. Until it really, really isn’t.

And then there’s the sound.
Unfortunately, it’s not good. Dialogue feels disconnected from the visuals, with what sounds like dubbed-in audio overtop. The mix is off, the syncing is loose, and it pulls you out of the film more than once.


āœ… What Makes It Work

• The metaphor is brutal and effective. Rotting from the inside while performing sweetness? We get it.
• It dares to go there. And by ā€œthere,ā€ we mean places that made us deeply, deeply uncomfy.
• Visuals are unforgettable. You will never look at frosting the same way.


āš ļø What Doesn’t Land

• The sound editing is rough. Distractingly so.
• Plot clarity is lacking. Is this a surreal fable? A literal breakdown? We’re not sure.
• Audience discomfort is real. This film is not for the faint of heart, the prudish, or the easily embarrassed.


šŸ’ø Should It Have a Bigger Budget?

Not necessarily. The lo-fi, hyper-saturated look adds to the weirdness. But the sound absolutely needed more attention. A tighter audio mix would’ve elevated the entire experience.



šŸŽÆ The Verdict

Sugar Rot is one of those movies you’ll either admire for its boldness… or swear to never speak of again. It’s artful, experimental, and uncomfortable in a way that feels intentional. But for us? It went a little too hard on the frosting and not hard enough on the structure.

Kit: 2/10 — ā€œThere’s a scene I literally can’t describe out loud. That’s a no for me.ā€
Cade: 1.5/10 — ā€œProps for pushing boundaries. I just wish I hadn’t invited people I know.ā€


šŸ“ŗ Where to Watch

Look for it at festivals or underground cinema circuits.
This is not a Netflix-and-chill type of experience.
It’s more like: Netflix and then unpack with your therapist.


šŸæ Pair This Movie With...

• Snack: Sour gummies. You’ll want something that fights back.
• Drink: Spiked soda you regret halfway through.

• Activity: Deleting your group chat. Or renaming it ā€œSorry About Sugar Rot.ā€


šŸŽ§Ā Spotify⁠⁠⁠

šŸĀ Apple Podcasts ⁠

šŸ“øĀ Instagram⁠⁠⁠⁠

info@CadeandKit.com

šŸŽ¬ CUFF 2025: The Festival That Built Us

Back where it started, with five films we’ll never forget.

A year ago, we sat in a theater at the Calgary Underground Film Festival and asked each other, ā€œShould we talk about this movie?ā€ We didn’t know it then, but that was the start of Cade & Kit: Real People. Real Reviews.

One year later, we’re back. Not just watching. Not just reacting.Ā Interviewing filmmakers. Hosting events. Filling chairs with new friends.Ā And once again—talking about movies that made us squirm, gasp, argue, and occasionally question our emotional stability.



šŸ“¹ Why CUFF Still Matters (Especially to Us)

CUFF isn’t your average film festival. It’s weird in all the right ways.

The programming leans bold, sometimes campy, often beautifully uncomfortable. It champions the undistributed, the emerging, and the offbeat. If Sundance is the studio audition, CUFF is the secret basement tape that gets passed around until it changes everything.

And for us, CUFF was the first time we really sat down to watch, reflect, and record what we thought—not as critics, but as real people. It’s our cinematic hometown. So yeah… we were a little emotional this year.


šŸŽ„ Five Films That Caught Us Off Guard

Across a packed 10 days, we saw a lot. But five films stuck with us. Each for completely different reasons.

Some were devastating. Some were absurd.
Some made us question genre boundaries.
Others made us… avert our eyes.

We’ll be sharing full reviews of each one in the coming days, but here’s a taste of the ride:

  • One short film tore itself apart, limb by limb… and we kind of loved it.

  • One feature had us staring at the floor in secondhand embarrassment (and full-body blush).

  • One adorable rug turned out to be... hungry. Very hungry.

  • One laundromat opened a portal to hell. No really. That happened.

  • And one Alberta-made exorcism film asked us: what if God showed up and we didn’t like what He had to say?


We’ll let you guess which is which.

(Or just stick around and read the reviews—there are twists coming.)




āœ… Real People, Real Community

The other thing that hit us this year?
The number of you who sat down beside us. Introduced yourselves.
Told us you’d listened. Argued with our ratings. Agreed with our hot takes.
Brought snacks. Brought questions. Brought your own perspectives.

That’s the dream. Because not everyone has a crew to go to movies with.
And if you don’t? You can always sit with us. That’s what Cade & Kit is really about.


šŸŽÆ What Comes Next

Over the next few days, we’re posting five full reviews—one for each of our top CUFF picks. Each post will follow our usual format: premise, reaction, breakdown, rating, pairings, and of course... us spiraling.

But before we get into that:

Thank you, CUFF.
For being weird. For being wonderful.
For giving us a home to come back to—and a reason to keep talking.


šŸŽ¤ We’re Cade & Kit. Real People. Real Reviews.

And CUFF 2025 was a trip.
See you in the next post.

And until then, if you’re heading to a festival… you can sit with us.


šŸŽ§ Spotify

šŸ Apple Podcasts

šŸ“ø Instagram

info@CadeandKit.com

šŸŽ¬ The Coffee Table: The Most Devastating Film We’ve Reviewed Yet

Technically horror. Emotionally wrecking. You’ve been warned.

We usually come into these reviews ready to debate plot holes, argue about genre tropes, and recommend snacks. This one’s different.

The Coffee Table isn’t just dark. It’s devastating. It’s the kind of film that leaves you physically sick, not because of what it shows — but because of what it forces you to feel. A slow, domestic spiral into trauma, denial, and irreversible loss, told with such restraint that by the time it breaks you, you’re already broken.

This is the most emotionally intense entry we’ve covered in the Top 13 Horror Films of 2024, sitting at #7 — and streaming now on Shudder and AMC+.




šŸ“¹ The Premise: A Baby, a Table, a Tragedy

A couple brings home their newborn baby and a hideous glass coffee table with gold naked-lady legs. Yes, seriously. That’s the setup. What starts as an argument over bad taste becomes something unimaginable.

Mom steps out for the first time since the birth. Dad’s left with the baby, mid-assembly of the unbreakable coffee table. He’s exhausted, frustrated, trying to soothe his crying son — and then the unthinkable happens.

The glass shatters.
The crying stops.
And suddenly, we are not in comedy-drama territory anymore.


šŸŽ„ The Format: Domestic Horror, Shot with Surgical Precision

The entire film is set in their modest apartment. The camera stays close, sometimes too close. There’s nowhere to escape — not for the characters, and definitely not for the audience.

The tension isn’t jump-scare scary. It’s real-life horror — watching someone spiral after an irreversible mistake. Watching denial, grief, and guilt build until it’s unbearable.

The acting is terrifyingly good. The scene where the father changes the baby’s diaper — after the accident — is one of the most haunting portrayals of shock we’ve ever seen.


āœ… What Makes It Work

• Unflinching emotional honesty. This isn’t sensational. It’s raw.
• Real characters in real rooms. No fantasy here — just heartbreak.
• Near-perfect pacing. It gives you just enough levity to breathe before plunging you back under.
• Genre-fluid storytelling. It’s horror because it’s horrifying, not because of a villain.


āš ļø What Doesn’t Land

• Limited genre texture. There are only a few traditionally ā€œhorrorā€ moments — so purists may not vibe.
• Emotionally punishing. Like, truly. Not everyone wants to sit in that much grief.
• A quiet, slow-burn intensity. If you’re expecting gore or monsters, this is not your film.


šŸ’ø Should It Have a Bigger Budget?

Honestly, no. The claustrophobia, the raw camera work, the silence — it all works because it’s small. Bigger budget might’ve dulled the blade.


šŸŽÆ The Verdict

A brutal, beautiful meditation on grief, responsibility, and the unbearable weight of love. The Coffee Table is less about jump scares and more about emotional collapse — and it absolutely earns its place on the top horror list, even if it sits closer to drama than dread.

Kit: 8.5/10 — ā€œI believed it. I felt it. I’ll lose sleep over it.ā€
Cade: 6.5/10 — ā€œGreat cinema, but more grief-core than horror for me.ā€


šŸ“ŗ Where to Watch

Streaming now on Shudder and AMC+.
But seriously: do not go into this lightly.
You need emotional padding and possibly a hug after.


šŸæ Pair This Movie With...

• Snack: Nothing. Truly. You won’t be hungry.
• Drink: Red wine you don’t enjoy but finish anyway.
• Activity: Deep breathing. Maybe a silent walk. Probably a group chat check-in.


šŸŽ¤ We’re Cade & Kit. Real People. Real Reviews.

And this one broke us a little.


šŸŽ§ Spotify⁠⁠⁠

šŸ Apple Podcasts ⁠

šŸ“ø Instagram ⁠⁠⁠⁠

info@CadeandKit.com

šŸŽ„ Milk and Serial: The $800 Horror Film That Somehow Ends Up Haunting You

There’s something oddly satisfying about stumbling into a horror film with no budget, no studio, and no business being this effective — and realizing halfway through, you’re fully invested. Milk and Serial is exactly that kind of film.

With a total reported budget of just $800 (most of which likely went to a single camera and one actor), it shouldn’t work. But it does. At least enough to land a spot on Variety’s Top 13 Horror Films of 2024 — right alongside movies with actual marketing budgets and VFX departments.

So we hit play. And then we spiraled.


šŸ“¹ The Premise: Pranks, Psychopaths, and a Brick

Milk and Serial follows two best friends, Milk and Seven, who run a YouTube prank channel. Their content? The chaotic, kind-of-messed-up kind that gets clicks, concern, and maybe the occasional cease and desist. On the surface, their biggest crime is bad taste and overcommitment. But beneath it?

Something much darker is brewing.

The story opens with a birthday prank that goes wrong — but that’s just the start. The more we watch, the more it becomes clear that Milk has layered this ā€œprankā€ with an ulterior motive. By the halfway mark, it’s no longer a question of surprise party antics. It’s a serial killer origin story hidden inside a YouTube channel.


šŸŽ„ The Format: Found-Footage with Intent

Shot entirely through handheld party cams, hidden setups, and ā€œprank camā€ perspectives, the lo-fi style isn’t a byproduct of the budget — it’s baked into the DNA of the film. The shaky lens, the grainy lighting, the out-of-focus moments? All intentional. The whole movie operates like something you'd find deep in a late-night YouTube rabbit hole.

And that’s both its charm and its challenge. While the aesthetic supports the story, it also makes for a visually difficult viewing experience. If Blair Witch-style cinematography makes you seasick, you’ve been warned.

But buried in that handheld chaos? A well-crafted villain who plays the long game.


āœ… What Makes It Work

• Milk is genuinely terrifying. The character delivers chilling monologues to the camera, deadpan confessions, and manipulations that feel too real.
• The writing is shockingly tight. For a film that looks like it was shot on a dare, the script pulls off slow-burn tension with actual payoff.
• It goes there. The plot includes staged shootings, fake breakups, dark web livestreaming, and manipulation so deep it becomes existential.


āš ļø What Doesn’t Land

• The format gets in its own way. The shaky cam is immersive but exhausting. At times, it pulls you out of the narrative more than it pulls you in.
• Some of the emotional beats fall flat. We wanted more resentment, more tension between Milk and Seven before things got violent.
• The ending is ambiguous. We’re still debating whether that final gunshot was a suicide or just a double-tap.


šŸ’ø Should It Have a Bigger Budget?

Absolutely. There’s a better movie inside this movie, waiting to be reborn with a real camera crew, a lighting setup, and maybe three more actors. We’d love to see this as a fully realized indie-horror project — maybe Creep meets Host, with the unsettling charisma turned up even further.


šŸŽÆ The Verdict

We’ve seen worse films with a million-dollar marketing campaign. Milk and Serial is flawed, but it’s memorable. It proves that when the writing lands and the villain is well-developed, you don’t need a studio to scare the hell out of people.

Cade: 5/10 — ā€œGreat concept, but I need a tripod.ā€
Kit: 3.5/10 — ā€œFantastic villain. Needed more meat around the bone. Trash-adjacent — but high-functioning trash.ā€


šŸ“ŗ Where to Watch

It’s free on YouTube.
It’s under an hour.
It’s the kind of weird you bring to group chat.


šŸæ Pair This Movie With...

• Snack: A questionable red velvet cupcake
• Drink: Anything with ice cubes and existential dread
• Activity: Text your best friend and tell them you trust them... probably


šŸŽ¤ We’re Cade & Kit. Real People. Real Reviews.
And if you ever catch us talking to a brick on camera… just run.


šŸŽ§Ā Spotify

šŸĀ Apple PodcastsĀ 

šŸ“øĀ Instagram⁠⁠⁠


info@cadeandkit.com